Love / Hate Revisited

Over the last year, we’ve talked a lot about love, hate and indifference relative to how consumers feel about the companies with which they do business – and specifically how consumers feel about their financial institutions, and how that impacts brand loyalty.

With so many institutions trying to be “all things to all people”, the industry has become commoditized; and in many cases, it’s become difficult for consumers to easily tell the differences between one institution and the next. As a result, many consumers are motivated by price or convenience factors, and lack the kind of strong emotional connection with their financial institutions that we see with other companies outside the industry like an Apple, Starbucks or Whole Foods for example.

As many financial institutions continue to take the safe approach marketing to the mass-middle-ground - or the indifferent, opportunities present themselves for others who are willing to take steps to truly differentiate their institution from the competition. But this requires a clearly defined target market and taking steps that will align your institution with their needs, values and preferences – you want to make it easy for your target to choose you over the competition, to feel that connection with your institution, and love doing business with your institution as a result. On the flip side of this, and the reason why many institutions don’t take these steps, is that you have to be willing to allow other consumers - those that aren't part of your target, to make the choice not to do business with you. In most cases, this means thinking differently about your pool of prospective customers - focusing your efforts on those that will love what you're doing while allowing others to hate what you're doing.

During the past week, I’ve seen two examples in television campaigns of companies embracing this love / hate concept: Crocs (the ugly slip-on plastic-looking shoes…as you can tell, I’m on the hate side of the spectrum) and Scion (the Toyota spin-off for those looking to express their individuality through their cars).

First, during the AVP Pro Volleyball Tournament sponsored by Crocs, I was introduced to the company’s “love ‘em or hate ‘em” campaign. Crocs shoes are very popular in my neighborhood, as I’m sure they are across the country; but the company’s marketing team understands that there are plenty of people like me who don’t like the shoes – and, it's embracing and promoting the love / hate feelings with a new crocslovehate.com website. The site is working to build buzz around the fact that people either love or hate the shoes, and draw people from the indifferent middle-ground to one side or the other.

Second, I was intrigued by commercial with a similar concept for Scion. Once again, Scion understands that some people love its cars and others hate them – and this is by design. The commercial includes the obvious message “love it or loathe it” to drive home the point.


Find more videos like this on AdGabber

What does the love / hate concept look like with banks and credit unions? Sure, we’ve seen our share of hate websites, blog posts and other commentary about bad experiences with financial institutions, but we don’t hear the kind of rants and raves from both sides of the spectrum like we do with these and other examples outside of the industry.

While we hear executives and marketers talk about their ideal customers and target market, we never hear them talk about the customers or members they don't want - or those that they're willing to lose in an effort to build a stronger connection with their target segments. So, if you know of an institution making strategic choices with “love us or hate us” attitude, I’d like to hear about it.