In a recent post, I talked about the ABA New England Marketing Chapters' Branding Symposium that I attended last month. The presentations, lead by Tom Asacker, author of A Clear Eye for Branding, offered some great insights and really challenged attendees to think critically about their brands.
After attending the symposium, I contacted Tom with a series of questions in hopes that he would offer his insights and perspective relative to branding and financial services. His responses to my questions follow.
BW: Why is the concept of branding so misunderstood?
TA: Great question Brady. I’ve been trying to answer that one myself for years. Kierkegaard wrote, “Concepts, like individuals, have their histories and are just as incapable of withstanding the ravages of times as are individuals.” Well, individual’s bodies may be incapable of withstanding change, but their belief systems are more than capable. And that’s what has happened with the concept of brand and branding. Many people locked onto the original marketplace concepts -brands and branding as marks of ownership and later as trademarks, logos and image advertising - and built their reputations around those concepts; e.g. logo designers, identity consultants, advertising agencies, etc. Their mindsets and business identities are now tied to those out-dated concepts, which absolutely preclude a change and serves to perpetuate the misunderstanding.
BW: Why is a clear eye for branding important?
TA: It’s not simply important, it’s critical. What is a brand? It’s something or someone that a customer chooses to be associated with, be it a brand of music player, politician, motorcycle, retail outlet, financial planner, or bank. Branding is everything a person or organization does to create and maintain a strong feeling with customers so that they are predisposed to continually choose and recommend them. Drucker wrote, “There is only one valid definition of business purpose: to create a customer.” Understanding how and why customers choose, as well as how to appeal to that decision-making process, is what having a clear eye for branding is all about.
BW: What does it mean for today’s banks and credit unions to have a clear eye for branding?
TA: Ultimately, it means that they have a visceral understanding of how to intelligently invest their time and money to attract and retain customers, with everything from the design of their outlets and web sites, to their employee training, marketing communications, product and service offerings, and community outreach. Today’s is a much more challenging marketplace than even the recent past. And given the latest economic outlook, and the fact that more than 95 percent of the households in the United States already have an active banking relationship, organizations that fail to recognize and adjust to the new consumer mindset are destined for failure. Or worse, they’ll become one more of the living-dead, with a relentless and stifling focus on cutting costs and downsizing. As a long-term brand strategy, operational efficiency is seldom the path to greatness.
BW: What companies – and specifically financial institutions, do you see demonstrating this level of thinking in terms of brand?
TA: I find it interesting that no financial institution springs readily to mind. What could possibly be more emotionally compelling to customers than their futures and financial well-being? Coffee? That being said, there are a few who are pushing the idea of fanatical commitment to "wowing" its customers and employees, for example Umpqua Bank and Commerce One.
BW: What barriers to you see facing community banks and credit unions when it comes to branding? And, what steps can executives and marketers take to overcome these barriers?
TA: The only true barriers are mindset and will. Seek first to understand, and then have the audacity to do what you know is right.
Feb 25, 2008
A Branding Conversation with Tom Asacker
Posted by Brady Walen at 9:47 AM
Labels: ABA New England Marketing Chapter, Branding, Marketing, Tom Asacker
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
This is such a timely post, especially with Tom's reference to Commerce. This morning Vernon Hill (who founded Commerce in 1973 at age 27) posts on bankstocks.com: "Most banks, by contrast, have generally done a very poor job of service and brand-building. By giving up on growth, focusing on cost cutting, and ignoring customer satisfaction, many institutions have become commodity providers with little growth and no fans."
It will be interesting to see if Commerce, now part of Toronto-Dominion bank, will be able to sustain its unique brand.
Tom's thoughts are good. What I think is unfortunate is that the banking world still needs so much education on the topic of branding, and understanding what it really is. It feels like we brand-centric folks have been out there delivering this "branding 101" speech for centuries now. It seems to me that meanwhile, the divide between the banking industry and the rest of the business world is widening.
I'd love to get a room full of Umpqua Banks, Commerce Banks, ING Directs, etc., and have an advanced discussion on brand innovation. As an industry we need to get bankers from the kiddie table to the adult table for some grown-up conversation.
Jeff Stephens
CEO, Creative Brand Communications
http://thestory.creative-brand.com
Post a Comment